Financial Institutional Failure:  How The Process Worked
A sub-prime mortgage is a mortgage to a person who has a poor credit history, has little to no income, and has not met previous payment obligations. The mortgages were often provided with little to no documentation of income and assets.
These mortgages were often provided by national, regional, and local banks, as well as lenders such as Countrywide Financial. These mortgages were often provided to minorities who could not otherwise have afforded them. Their lack of genuine credit-worthiness is being verified by the current proportion of defaults among sub-prime mortgages.
Starting in 1977, under the Community Reinvestment Act, CRA, banks were mandated to provide sub-prime mortgages and loans in order to be allowed by the US government to continue operating and performing other business such as expansions, mergers, and developing new business and branches.
The world's financial system is crumbling under the weight of sub-prime mortgage defaults. People who were given mortgages they could not afford are walking away and defaulting on those mortgages -- yes, their homes.
ACORN is likely not troubled by today's credit problems. Nor are ACORN's founders and leadership likely concerned that many minority homeowners could lose their homes. This is because the ideological goal of ACORN’s radical founders has always been to destroy capitalism and replace it with socialism. In today's financial situation, the resolution will involve the government getting larger. Free markets will become less free. Large amounts of capital will shift from private investment into government.
This mechanism works in ACORN's favor. Those poor minority homeowners who get displaced will be that much more easily led to support ACORN's class war against capitalism.
ACORN, the Obama-affiliated community organizing group, had demanded through its Democrat Congressional legislators that it be included in the original $700 billion financial bailout package. ACORN demanded and was set to receive its wish in the first bailout package. That bill was defeated by House Republicans.
Republican defeat of the original $700 billion bailout bill saved taxpayers $20 billion.
Obama's campaign paid ACORN affiliates during the 2008 Democratic primary race. Leading up to the 2008 Ohio Democratic Primary, Obama’s campaign paid Citizens Services, Inc., a subsidiary of ACORN, $832,598, between February 25 and March 17, apparently for get-out-the-vote activities.
The Congressional so-called stimulus package of February, 2009, includes $4.1 billion of funding for community groups such as ACORN.
Obama seen here advising his ACORN workers.
In November, 2007, while speaking to an ACORN assembly, Obama said, "I've been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career."
Financial Breakdown 2008:
Today's financial problems originated with the misconception that basic laws of economics can be violated by politicians intent upon redistributing wealth from those who earn it to those who are not able to earn enough to justify their reaping rewards as if they had earned it. And those politicians -- using the powers we, the voters, gave them -- dictate how much of our money we may keep... and how much we must pass along to those minorities earning less than they want. This debacle did not start on Wall Street. It was born in Congress, in the Carter administration, and, when it started to fail, it was given new life during the early years of the Clinton administration.   ACORN's leadership strong-armed its Washington lawmakers into forcing banks and mortgage lenders to lend mortgage money to financially unqualified minorities and others who everyone knew would never continue to pay their mortgage payments over time. Because these lender institutions were forced to lend to unqualified home buyers, they did what any business would do under similar circumstances:  They found a way to sell off those likely bad loans to other investors.

Since no one in their right mind would buy a package of bad loans, the only way to sell them to investors was to mix them in with good loans and sell pre-packaged goodies that had both good and bad in them. Thus was invented specialized derivatives. These loan derivatives are the CDOs and other instruments that today have no value to the marketplace, are therefore causing huge bank writedowns, and in turn, bank defaults.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac using their implicit government guarantees, purchased packages of bad and good mortgages known as Mortgage Backed Securities, MBSs. Banks also packaged bad and good mortgages into other forms known as Collateralized Debt Obligations, CDOs. These huge debt obligations were then resold to Wall Street investment banking houses, including Lehman, Bear Stearns, Goldman Sachs, and others, as well as investors around the world. Once the financial house of cards began to fail, banks refused to do business with other banks and investment banking institutions. That refusal shut down and locked up the short-term interbank credit and lending markets. It is today these final purchasers -- those left holding the bag of derivatives -- that are having to writedown and write off tens-of-billions of dollars of debt.
Enforcement of laws including the CRA has come to mean that once ACORN accuses a bank of racial discrimination and unleashes protestors against it -- no matter how unjustly -- any bank could suddenly face unfriendly government regulators. Thus banks were placed in the position of being easy targets for ACORN shakedowns and paying protection money became necessary for many large and local banks' survival.
Having a heavy political arm weighing upon their business operations, banks started making hundreds of thousands of what became known as "Ninja", translating to" No income, No job, No assets. These loans went to minorities who would have been deemed un-creditworthy. Banks, knowing that a relatively high portion of Ninja loans that they had been coerced to make would turn bad, many lending institutions grouped them into new types of investment packages. They were then sold to shed risk to the originating institutions.
The huge quasi-governmental lending institutions Freddie Mac and Fanny Mae have both been run by Democrat appointees. Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac became sources of funding for groups -- including ACORN -- that supported Democrat politicians who then often promoted high-risk subprime home loans.
Most Americans who pay taxes are justifiably disgusted with the US government's $700 billion wall street bailout package. The root causes of this unseemly solution are buried in the Carter years with enactment of its Community Reinvestment Act in 1977, and were continued with enthusiasm by the Clinton administration, Representative Barney Frank, Senator Chris Dodd, Chuck Schumer, other Democrat lawmakers and -- most especially -- by groups like ACORN, which was Obama's favorite client over the years. As mortgages and loans to the unworthy became less attainable ACORN lobbied these same legislators and other Democrats in Congress to expand the implicit government guarantees provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Hence the government (actually the taxpayers) has to step in to fill the holes caused by Democrat government do-gooders who told banks to lend to minorities with poor credit ratings regardless of what their credit qualifications, income, and FICO scores.
Handing out housing loans and mortgages to financially-unqualified minorities that did not make good economic sense might have made you feel good during boom times. How does it feel today? How does it feel after your stock portfolio where you carefully placed your "buy-and-hold-sure-thing investments" has decreased significantly in value... and in many cases investments have become more worthless than those mortgage holders?
GlobalNewsDaily.com is a trademark of Technology America Corporation.  All rights reserved.  All other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.

This site is on the highway of

Always useful, mapped and paved with information.SM

Use of this site is subject to all international and USA copyright laws.
Any third party web sites you may link to from here are entirely out of the control of GlobalNewsDaily.com and Technology America Corporation. We do not endorse, and are not associated with, products, services, information, statements, material or people on, or connected with, third party sites.
GlobalNewsDaily.comTM  ---  Ensuring the Liquefication of InformationSM
Copyright © Technology America Corporation, 2007-2012 USA